Tuesday, June 12, 2007

The NCAA is run by old guys

Pulled straight from the file of "What the hell were you thinking?", the NCAA is enforcing a rule that prevents live blogging from the press box during a game. A Louisville Courier-Journal reporter was ejected from the press box of Jim Patterson stadium and had his credentials revoked when it was discovered he had (gasp!) been blogging throughout the game and the NCAA tournament.

Live blogging from the game, a practice that isn't new by any stretch, C-J writer Brian Bennett (pictured) was told that it "is against NCAA policies. We're revoking the credential and need to ask you to leave the stadium."

It's really quite obvious, but I guess I'll say it anyway. This is so incredibly dumb. Not only is the NCAA refusing to have its event promoted via the Internet, a forum they are obviously very ignorant of, but they ejected the evil-doer from the stadium, preventing him from further reporting on their event.

In a stadium that was constructed with the funding of the University of Louisville (a large part of it coming from the stadium's namesake) and state dollars, the NCAA should keep their hands out of who is doing what in a school's press box. It should be the host school policing each press box, and enforcing an arcane NCAA rule is likely the last thing UL wants to do to its local media folk.

First, the Courier-Journal needs to demand a changing of the rule and could even ask for an apology, although they would never get one.

Second, the University of Louisville needs to man up and let the NCAA know they disagree with the rule, that is if they would like to maintain a solid working relationship with the Louisville C-J.

Third, the NCAA needs to can this rule, it is obviously curtailing exposure for their sport, something they should know is never smart.

Just in case anyone was wondering if the NCAA is run by a bunch of curmudgeons, now all doubt has been removed. Those damn internets!

Reasonably yours,

E-mail us

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Don't try and put yourself in LeBron's shoes, they're too big

An underreported story in America, but a major crisis nonetheless, the genocide and humanitarian crisis in the Darfur region of Sudan has really gotten to Cleveland's Ira Newble.

For those unaware, here's the short version of what's happening in Darfur. The Sudanese government funds a militia group called the Janjaweed that has caused somewhere between 200,000 and 450,000 deaths in response to prior rebellions by insurgents who sought autonomy from their non-representative government. The Chinese and Russian governments have given money and military supplies to the Sundanese government, which in turn goes toward oppressing and killing more people. China buys 2/3 of Sudan's oil, and thus are fully vested in maintaining that relationship at a cutthroat cost. Bottom line? It's a bad situation that isn't getting any better. The Wikipedia article on it is pretty accurate and explains it in a lot more detail than I will here.

Back to Ira Newble. The Cavs journeyman, who has played 8 minutes thus far in this year's playoff run, read up on the Darfur situation and got motivated. After gathering information and communicating with a professor/activist on the issue, Newble decided it was time to do something about it. So, Newble drafted an open letter to the Chinese government urging the Chinese government to use its power to end the suffering in Darfur before it hosts the Summer Olympics in 2008. Then, he sought all of his teammates to sign the letter as a showing of support in an effort to increase awareness along with trying to influence the Chinese government. Everyone signed...except for two players. LeBron James and reserve guard Damon Jones both declined.

LeBron signed a $90 million deal with Nike of which he still benefits. Jones recently signed a shoe contract with Li Ning, the leading Chinese sports manufacturer.

With Nike having a huge vested interest in China and Jones' sponsor also obviously having large stakes there, the reason for their refusal to sign the letter is pretty obvious. LeBron said he didn't want to sign because, "it's basically not having enough information" and Jones simply refused comment about the issue.

Now, writers around the country are jumping on their high horses (1, 2, 3, plus many more) to denounce James for putting his financial interests ahead of an opportunity to show support and raise awareness of an underreported issue. Many are shaming him for refusing to use his platform as a potential soapbox. Newble has even voiced a bit of displeasure about LeBron's refusal, but admits that LeBron needs more time to educate himself about the issue before he were to represent himself like that. Never mind the fact that he's been in the middle of leading an awful basketball team (and a terrible coach) to the Finals for the first time in his career, almost all by himself. Also, let's throw aside the fact that his long-time girlfriend is going to give birth to his second child any day now. The man likely hasn't had time to keep up on the local weather, much less on international conflicts.

I applaud Newble for his efforts, and it would be great if it catches on. Writers should be focusing more on lauding Newble than denouncing James.

Personally, I refuse to denounce or laud LeBron's decision to wait or refuse signing altogether, if that is what he ultimately decides. All the writers out there that are piling on him for not risking his and his employer's (Nike) money for a cause really need to check themselves. It's very easy to denounce someone successful or famous for not risking/spending their money when the denouncer isn't risking anything themselves. And, to a degree, it goes similarly for Newble. Making around $3.2 million a year, and little else from endorsements, Newble's risk is much lower than what LeBron would be laying on the line by signing a letter calling out the Chinese government.

In fact, this is indicative of a larger issue that I'll write about sometime in the future: it's very easy to criticize someone's decision when it's impossible to put yourself in their shoes.

The situation in Darfur needs exposure, but the point no one is making in the reporting of all this is that LeBron's choice to wait on making a deicision about the letter is giving more publicity to the issue than it likely would have gotten if LeBron would have joined a list of NBA players led by Ira Newble. Either way, it's his decision to champion the causes he wants to. It's not like he's some kind of greedy scrooge who doesn't help out with the community.

So, I will withhold my judgement of LeBron. Until I have a nine-figure paycheck staring me in the face, I'll never pretend to know. I won't hold my breath waiting for that one.

Reasonably yours,

E-mail us